top of page

Top Ten Criminals in the World

  • Writer: Ritik Agrawal
    Ritik Agrawal
  • May 11
  • 18 min read

Manshi Raj

Usha Martin University, Ranchi, Jharkhand

Four panels: inmates in prison attire, one behind bars, one with handcuffs between officers, one holding a sign, and one sitting in a cell.

Introduction 

The introduction of the article titled "Top Ten Criminals in the World" consists of an account of the most monstrous people who have ever walked the planet and have committed heinous acts in the course of history. Here, the author elaborates on the backgrounds of these criminals, their offenses, the laws that were violated, and the punishments assigned to them. The overwhelming aim of this article, however, is to bring out the monstrosity of their deeds and the punishment meted out as an alarm to all those with the intention of abusing the law. It is intended to raise public awareness about the need for justice and to draw attention to the part of the law in the establishment of order in either the national or international contexts. Here, is the list of Top Ten Criminals in the World :- 

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, one of the most recognized drug lords in history, led the Sinaloa cartel, which is another drug-trafficking organization from Mexico. Coming from a poor family in Sinaloa, he came to be known for smuggling considerable amounts of illegal drugs, including cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and, not least, marijuana, into the U.S. and other countries. His empire was created through a combination of corruption, bloodshed, and instilling fear, which combined allowed him to export various cocaine and bequeath him with billions of dollars while eyeballing sugaring damage in many communities across the world. Accordingly, he was declared by the U.S. Department of Treasury to be "most powerful drug trafficker in the world". Apart from drug trafficking, Guzmán committed many violent acts to assure his power and eliminate his enemies, including assassinations, kidnappings, and torture. Guzmán employed elaborate smuggling techniques to evade law enforcement, including building underground tunnels or bribing police. Notably, Guzmán escaped from prison on two different occasions, even after being imprisoned several times, which further added to his reputation as a criminal genius. Guzman is alleged to have committed several crimes, including violations of the U.S. Controlled Substances Act, which made criminal drug-trafficking acts, and of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act: a federal law before the courts intended at fighting organized crimes in America; Guzmán was charged with drug-trafficking, money-laundering perhaps, murders or conspiracies. 

The case against Guzmán, United States v. Guzmán Loera, One of the most significant legal battles against organized crime in more recent years. The trial was now in Brooklyn, New York, for three months and listening to testimonies from more than 50 witnesses who have done work with Guzmán before. The prosecutors this time around really showed that Guzmán was smuggling more than 200 tons of drugs into the U.S. and didn't shy away from violence in a bid to maintain power over the business. 

Judgment and Punishment  

In 2019 Guzmán was convicted of drug trafficking, illegal possession of firearms, and running a continuing criminal enterprise. The sentence handed down by the Court required Guzmán to spend life in prison plus 30 years, and the sentence reaffirmed the gravity of his crimes. Guzmán was ordered to forfeit an additional $12.6 billion, which represents what he made in the drug trafficking business.

Guzmán is now serving his sentence at the U.S. Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Colorado, the most secure prison in the country. His conviction is regarded as a landmark in the war against international drug cartels, a showcasing of concerted international efforts to fight organized crime and of what people could expect as punishment for their involvement in it. 

Manson headed a group known as the "Manson Family," consisting of youthful individuals who cohabitated with him in a commune in California in the late 1960s. He had strong influence and power over them and had so thoroughly convinced them that he was their messiah. He spoke of an impending race war, which he dubbed "Helter Skelter," after a Beatles song he badly misinterpreted. He directed his followers to create many murders and hence trigger this fictional conflict, creating disorder and blaming the African Americans for the acts.

Manson's followers killed seven people during the night of 8 and 9 August 1969. Among them were actress Sharon Tate, who was eight months pregnant, and four others at her home in Los Angeles. The next night, they killed Leno and Rosemary LaBianca in a similarly grisly manner. The brutality of these murders shocked the nation, especially for the messages written in the victims' blood at the scene.

On 1 July 1970, Manson and several of his followers were charged with murder and conspiracy according to California Penal Code § 187, which prohibits killing a human being with intent to inflict bodily harm. 

In the case of People v. Manson, this trial has been, and still is, perhaps most shocking in all American history, lasting almost a year. Manson himself is said by prosecutors not to have killed anyone, but simply to have masterminded the murders by instructing his followers to do the acts instead.

The evidence included statements of ex-cult members and disturbing messages scrawled on the walls at the crime scenes. Of particular importance was Linda Kasabian, a former cult follower, who, while not involved in the murders, was present during their commission. Her testimony against Manson and his co-defendants did much to bolster the case against them. 

Judgment and Punishment

In September 1971, Charles Manson was convicted of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, and was sentenced to death. The death sentences were handed to him and three of his female followers-Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkel, and Leslie Van Houten. However, in 1972, the California Supreme Court abolished the death penalty, changing all such sentences to life imprisonments. Manson spent the rest of his days behind bars, and his bizarre antics, as well as his tight-knit band of followers, kept him perpetually in the public eye. The impact of People v. Manson comes down as one of the most vicious in the history of the justice system in America, showing to us all the dangers of cults and the accompanying manipulation and groupthink. His acts marked America hard and remind everyone how far charm and authority can go in instigating outrageous acts of violence. He died in prison in 2017, aged 83. 

  1. Ted Bundy :- 

Active in the 1970s, Ted Bundy was an infamous American serial killer. Charm and intelligence were the tools with which he attracted potential victims, because he posed as a person in need of assistance or acted as an authority figure. However, he was a violent predator-type person who kidnapped, raped, and murdered a large number of young women, mostly college girls. His crimes spanned multiple states, including Washington, Utah, Colorado, and Florida. Bundy himself confessed to killing more than 30 women by the end, but actual numbers could be far higher than that. His crimes were marked by extreme violence. In some, he would whack them unconscious and then sexually assault and strangle them. In some cases, he returned to the murder scenes to commit necrophilia. Despite being apprehended on multiple occasions, Bundy managed to escape from police custody twice, which added to his notoriety. His last murders happened in Florida, leading to his arrest and conviction. Based on the Florid 

The most significant case against him was State of Florida v. Theodore Robert Bundy, In January 1978, two women were murdered at the Chi Omega sorority house at Florida State University. During this attack, Bundy assaulted four women, killing two and seriously injuring the others. He was also charged with the murder of 12-year-old Kimberly Leach, whose kidnapping and death strengthened the case against him. The trial attracted national media attention because of Bundy’s unpredictable actions. Representing himself, he turned the courtroom into a dramatic scene, often arguing with the judge and trying to control the trial. However, the prosecution had strong evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and bite mark evidence that matched Bundy’s dental impressions.

Judgment and Punishment

Bundy was found guilty of the Chi Omega murders in 1979 and sentenced to death. Another trial was held in 1980 for the murder of a young girl, Kimberly Leach, for which he was again sentenced to death. He would, though, spend nearly a decade on death row, after having confessed many more murders. The case was also one of the first in the presences of court to incorporate bite Mark analysis into sound evidence; this subsequently influenced a good number of other legal cases. On January 24, 1989, he was zapped into electric at Florida State Pact. That was the end of the reign of terror that left many families heartbroken and shocked the entire nation. 

The impact of this case State of Florida v. Theodore Robert Bundy is important for its legal and social effects. It represented a primer on the large powers of forensic evidence in crime-solving and the several risks faced by awed people who lead others astray into some things terribly hideous. Ted Bundy's case is an extreme case in point, reminding society that appearances may not always be reliable, urging some vigilance, and stressing the importance of justice in keeping the community tranquil. 

Osama bin Laden was the founder and head of al-Qaeda, a terrorist group known to have carried out some of the worst attacks of modern times. Born into a wealthy family in Saudi Arabia, he became radicalized and turned against Western countries, most notably the United States, because of their military presence in the Middle East and their foreign policies. His extreme beliefs ignited the global jihadist movement and advanced him to become the most wanted terrorist of the world.

Bin Laden planned several exponent attacks, with the most famous being the ones within September 11, 2001, against the United States: hijacked planes struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. Some 3,000 died in that mayhem, and destruction was preposterous. He was also linked to the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania that killed over 200 people and the bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000.

He was charged in absentia by the United States with several crimes.  

A notable case was the indictment for the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings, where Prosecutors had supposedly planned organized attacks on U.S. diplomatic sites in East Africa. The accusations were grounded in Title 18 of the United States Code, covering terrorism, murder, and conspiracy. Bin Laden had wanted to be caught in a very risky upbringing setting whatever strategic plan he placed into motion; safer havens in Afghanistan and later in Pakistan were used against him throughout intense feverish efforts on the part of U.S. and allied forces. Moving on, from such locations, he continued to prosecute his acts of terror and videotaped propaganda-like exigencies urging more attacks on the West. 

Judgment and Punishment

Although they never had the opportunity to hold bin Laden in front of a tribunal for his actions, a worldwide search commenced, culminating on May 2, 2011, with a U.S. military operation against him. In a shootout in Abbottabad, Pakistan, Navy SEALs assaulted his hideout, in which he met death. It ended a long chase of about ten years-and of course it was celebrated as a major victory in the fight against terrorism.

The death of Osama bin Laden had a huge impact on the fight against terrorism all around the globe. It symbolized, in some sense, justice for all the people mourning the dead and injured in the attacks perpetrated by Osama bin Laden, while simultaneously embodying the arduous tasks posed by scattered terror groups in the world. His legacy serves as a reminder that extremism spares no one and therefore the countries need to collaborate with each other to ensure globe safety. Bin Laden's death did not eradicate terror, but indeed made louder a voice that warned of a price to be paid for this horror. 

There's no end to Pablo Escobar's story, for he was born into poverty and started as a poor criminal in Colombia. There are no legitimized tales of how Escobar made billions of dollars, built his palace, and became among the richest people in the world. Escobar's organization smuggled enormous amounts of cocaine into the U.S. and other countries, making him billions of dollars. Acting like the King of Cocaine, his cartel had control of 80% of the cocaine that entered the U.S. from 1980 to 1990.

Escobar's reign was characterized by brutal violence. Politicians, police, journalists, and rival drug lords met their end on Escobar's orders. His cartel caused thousands of deaths, many of them innocent people. Escobar also used his wealth to exert undue political influence, bribing officials and even running for office in order to avoid deportation to the U.S. It is his mixture of violence and corruption that made Escobar a terrifying specter in Colombia.

Escobar was prosecuted in both Colombia and the United States for drug trafficking, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit murder. Extradition proceedings were requested by the United States; however, Escobar fiercely opposed them, threatening and bribing Colombian officials to resist extradition. The political debate in Colombia turned to a discussion of whether to extradite Escobar or let him serve his time.

Then again, even with strong evidence to mat jeta, Escobar would evade justice for many years with his power and intimidation. In 1991, he would surrender to the Colombian government while promising not to be extradited to America. Despite making a deal with the Colombian government, he was placed in a luxury prison he built himself called "La Catedral," where he still managed his drug operations. Then, after Colombian authorities attempted to transfer him to a more secured post, he escaped, and a worldwide manhunt ensued. 

Judgment and Punishment

When Escobar never officially stood trial and was found guilty, it was primarily credited to his escape and subsequent hiding. The Colombian police, again with the support of U.S. agencies such as the DEA, found him more than a year after reporting him missing in Medellin. On December 2, 1993, he was killed in a shootout with police after escaping across rooftops.

The impact of the case includes the death of Pablo Escobar, signaling the closure of a violent chapter in the history of Colombia, yet, the drug trade was not entirely eradicated. His life serves to underscore the profound impact that organized crime and drug trafficking has had on society. Escobar's legacy is complex; he was both feared for his violence while at the same time admired by some for his charitable work in impoverished areas. With Escobar's death came an increased resolve in the war on drugs world over; it demonstrated the urgency of the need to work across borders against such vicious criminal networks. 

A guard stands in front of three prisoners in orange jumpsuits inside cells. Dim lighting, gray bars, and a peach-colored wall set the scene.

Adolf Eichmann was a senior Nazi officer during World War II and chief architect of the destruction of six million Jews and millions of others in the Holocaust. He presided over the Gestapo's Department for Jewish Affairs and was instrumental in devising and executing the "Final Solution," the plan of extermination against the Jewish race. He was responsible for the mass deportation of Jews from their homes throughout Europe to concentration camps and extermination camps like Auschwitz.

After the war, Eichmann slipped into Europe and lived incognito in Argentina under an assumed name. For over a decade, he eluded capture, until 1960 when the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, found him through a covert operation and captured him. Eichmann was then taken to Israel and put on trial, which became one of the great war crimes trials of the 20th century. 

In the case of The Attorney General of the Government of Israel v. Adolf Eichmann the trial against Adolf Eichmann commenced in 1961 in Jerusalem, under the Israeli law for punishing Nazis and their collaborators, to bring the war criminals from the Holocaust to justice. Eichmann was charged with 15 crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes, crimes against the Jewish people, and being a member of a criminal organization (the Nazi SS). A great number of survivors recounted their harrowing experiences during the trial, while a lot of evidence was produced to show how Eichmann had been connected to the Nazi genocide. Eichmann's defense claimed that he was simply following orders and had done nothing on his own accord, which was contrary to the court's argument. This court was able to prove that Eichmann, apart from being involved, was deeply implicated in planning and carrying out the genocide. 

Judgment and Punishment

On December 15, 1961, Eichmann was found guilty on all counts and was sentenced to death. The court declared that he had played a central role in the Holocaust, and the defense of "following orders" did not excuse him from the crimes he committed.

Eichmann's appeal was dismissed, and on June 1, 1962, he was hanged in Israel. His remains were cremated, and his ashes were distributed at sea to eliminate any possibility of a monument or burial location.

This trial was one of few early television broadcasts documenting its testimony on the Holocaust it reflected upon people all over the world. The court established a reference point about individual accountability for crimes against humanity and reaffirmed that the defense of obedience to orders was no justification for such acts. The trial also represented an important occasion in the movement for justice for victims of genocide and other serious crimes. 

Due primarily to al-Zawahiri's avowal of global terrorism, the U.S. government leveled multiple indictments against him under federal laws, namely terrorism, conspiracy to commit murder, and providing material support for terrorist groups. These included such important legal frameworks as the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the U.S. Criminal Code dealing with international terrorism. There could not be a single trial relating to al-Zawahiri under the plausible act of forgetting what he had done due to avoiding capture. However, his various indictments were based on his planning activities for al-Qaeda. Al-Zawahiri had been declared one of the most wanted terrorists by U.S. authorities, including the FBI, who also placed a $25 million bounty on information leading to his capture. For probably decades, he became the ultimate target of international intelligence agencies, inhabiting himself in safe locations in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

Judgment and Punishment

Al-Zawahiri's death is an important win for the world in the fight against terrorism: it has weakened al-Qaeda and set an example for the other extremist towers. However, the rise of terrorist bastions in Afghanistan, following the exit of the U.S. military, raises concerns. Ayman al-Zawahiri's situation shows an endless cycle of challenges in dealing with terrorism and, thus, the necessity of working together globally so as to bring wrongdoers to justice. It instructs that even individuals who dodge justice for decades might, in the end, get to face the lyricism of their actions. 

  1. Al Capone :- 

Alphonse "Al" Capone is an American gangster known for his reputation in the Prohibition era of the 1920s and 1930s. He was born in Brooklyn, but he later moved to Chicago, where he established one of the most influential crime syndicates, the Chicago Outfit. Capone had enormous profits from bootlegging, gambling, and prostitution. He was famous for his ostentatious lifestyle, his continued control over Chicago's criminal underbelly, and his involvement with bloody spectacles: following the St. Valentine's Day Massacre in 1929, in which seven members of a rival gang were killed.Though deeply involved in crime and violence, Capone managed, apparently, to avoid direct blame, making it impossible for police to charge him with any serious crimes. The man was both feared and admired by the public, hence the nickname "Scarface." 

In case of United States v. Capone  the Serious charges of murder and racketeering against Al Capone had remained impossible for many years because law enforcement never had any direct evidence. But through the ensuing years, however, those federal agents, led by Eliot Ness and his team, which took on the name "The Untouchables," shifted their focus to Capone's financial dealings. Following the trail of income and expenditures, they found inconsistencies that proved Capone was guilty of tax evasion.

In 1931, the U.S. government indicted Capone for failure to pay taxes on his illegal profits in the case United States v. Capone. This high-profile trial became the talk of America, with prosecution using forensic accounting to prove Capone made money from illegal sources and had not filed tax returns for several years.

Capone initially pleaded for a deal to get a lighter sentence but was turned down by the judge. He was tried and convicted for numerous counts of tax evasion. 

Judgment and Punishment

In October 1931, Al Capone was convicted of federal tax evasion. His sentence was for a total of 11 years, with a fine of $50,000, plus costs. Reimbursement of back taxes roughly around $215,000 was due. Al Capone went through some of the prisons, including the worst of them all: Alcatraz.

While in prison, Capone's health deteriorated. Due to the horrible sickness of untreated syphilis, neurological problems developed. In view of his poor health, he was released on parole in 1939 after serving roughly 7.5 years. He spent the remainder of his days in Florida, living peacefully until he died in 1947.

The prosecution of Capone was the biggest victory for federal law enforcement and a demonstration that even the fiercest criminals must stand trial. The case opened a new era about reliance on the examination of financial documents in order to nail organized crime leaders. That conviction in itself was a highwater mark in law enforcement history and remains a monument today in the battle against organized crime. 

Dawood Ibrahim is one of India's most wanted criminals and a fugitive now wanted worldwide, notorious for deep involvement in organized crime and connections to terrorism. He was born in 1955 in Dongri, Mumbai, and started just as a petty smuggler before he turned into a larger mafia don. He formed D-Company, which went on to become one of the most feared mafia groups engaged in drug trafficking, extortion, illegal arms dealing, and money laundering.

The most notorious act attributed to him was the 1993 Bombay bombings, a series of 12 coordinated explosions in Mumbai that left more than 250 people dead and over 700 injured. These bombings were, in essence, a revenge for the destruction of Babri Masjid and subsequent communal riots that swept through the city. This terrible act branded him into a terrorist and attracted international attention. He left India in the early 1990s and is believed to be residing in Pakistan, with alleged protection from the state, although such claims are denied by Pakistan. 

In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Dawood Ibrahim Dawood Ibrahim has been charged with multiple charges under various laws in India, among which IPC sections refer to murder, conspiracy and rioting. TADA pertains to an organization and funding of the Bombay bombings of 1993. Unlawful Activities refers to other terrorist activities. NDPS pertains to drug trafficking. The Indian government has connected Dawood to money laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and put him on the most wanted list. There are several red corner notices issued for him by Interpol. Despite all the best efforts of the Indian law enforce­ ment and intelligence agencies, Dawood has eluded capture. His trial is so in absentia: he is not in the court. The main evidence includes confessions of his aides, financial records connect­ ing him to illegal activities, and testimonies of victims and law enfor­ cement. His role in global terrorism has earned him the designation of "international terrorist" from the United Nations, and several countries­ including the United States-have imposed sanctions against him. 

Judgment and Punishment

Dawood Ibrahim continues to be a fugitive, and no formal decision has been taken yet. In this sense, the Indian authorities have seized his properties, sold them at auction, and curtailed his command. India continues to exert diplomatic and international pressure to ensure he is effectively extradited from Pakistan.

However, this case bears wider ramifications as it exemplifies the difficulty of fighting international crime and terrorism. Mutable organizations are always highlighted by Dawood Ibrahim's long escape from justice, showing the weakness of global law enforcement when subjected to political pressure. Yes, ever since the 1993 Bombay bombings, India has been carrying this weight on her chest.

Even now, until Ibrahim is caught, it's mostly seen as national pride; healing for the families of the victims won't take place.

It serves as a strong reminder that organized crime can mature into a worldwide hazard; it merges with terrorism to disturb societies and evade punishment. 

Bernard Bernie Madoff was a well-known American financier and the past chairman of the NASDAQ stock exchange. He became popular mainly because of his investment firm known as Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, which attracted a lot of wealth and affluent parties, charities, and organizations. However, Madoff had run out the biggest Ponzi scheme ever to defraud thousands of investors about $65 billion.

In a Ponzi scheme, money from new investors is used to pay returns to earlier investors instead of coming from actual profits. Madoff promised steady and high returns regardless of what was happening on the market, thus reassuring the investors' minds. His scheme collapsed during the 2008 financial crisis after which time so many of his investors demanded access to their money that he could no longer meet the payouts. 

In the case of United States v. Bernard L. MadoffIn the U.S., after Madoff's arrest in December 2008, several serious charges were filed against him by the government under federal securities laws, which includes but are not limited to: securities fraud, for deceiving investors and for manipulation of the markets; wire fraud, for use of electronic communications in committing his fraud; mail fraud, for further use of the postal service in conducting his scheme; money laundering, for concealing the source of unlawfully acquired money. Besides the charges, the SEC launched a separate investigation into Madoff's company, which went on to discover how Madoff created fictitious account statements and intentionally distorted financial records to feign success. The size and duration of the fraud shocked the financial community, for Madoff cheated individual investors, charities and pension funds, and major institutions alike. Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal crimes in March 2009, admitting that he conducted the Ponzi scheme for many years. “I knew what I was doing was wrong,” he said, taking full blame for the huge fraud. 

Judgment and Punishment

In June 2009, Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum possible, by U.S. District Judge Denny Chin. The court stated that Madoff's actions were tremendously wicked and extremely damaging to his victims since many lost their entire savings and means of living. He was also ordered to forfeit $170.8 billion, which was believed to be the total amount of the fraud.

Madoff admitted his guilt and was very sorry to have betrayed the trust of his investors during the sentencing. Unfortunately, the apology never healed the financial and emotional wounds he inflicted on several victims.

The fallout from this case was that it exposed rampant deficiencies in the SEC in regulatory oversight. Yet, despite a majority of investigations undertaken into Madoff over time, the fraud was never clear to their eye. Henceforth followed the usual regulation and tightening up in ways decent protection systems could be implemented just to have a justice delivered thereafter.

Madoff's actions were also a lesson on the hazards of placing blind faith in one's financial advisors, thus demonstrating how badly transparency and due diligence were needed. Although there have been attempts to recover the lost money, many victims could not recoup their full investments.

Madoff died in prison in April 2021 at age 82, leaving behind a legacy of deception in finance-his reputation a warning to investors and regulators the world over. 

Conclusion :

The stories of the world's top ten criminals teach one how crime has made an impact on individuals, communities, and states. These criminals have committed terrible acts like terrorism, organized crime, fraud, and violence, leaving an indelible mark in history. Their deeds serve as an important reminder that justice, law enforcement, and global teamwork need to be upheld in the fight against crimes. This article intends to share the results of these actions, claiming that although criminals may seem very powerful, by and large, justice wins. 

References : 

Komentarze


EMAIL

CONTACT

+91 8349512882 (Ritik)

+91 8770503968 (Vidhi)

  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram

Thanks for submitting!

© 2020-24 Jusscriptum

bottom of page